![]() ![]() I did a new reinstall into a different directory. I did the complete removal of Office 2003 Professional. I do not see a solution within the comments of this thread. I realize someone has marked this thread SOLVED, but I am still having the problem. Though the Microsoft Knowledge Base has a lot of articles on how to repair the damage created by using these utilities. If an application is installed by User #1, and used as well by User#2, the registry cleaner operation run by User#1 cannot remove the instances of the application created by User#2. If an application is installed and used only by one user, a registry cleaner run by another user will remove "invalid" entries in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and disable the application from working by the other user(s) Because registry cleaners (and REGEDIT.EXE) operate under SYSTEM permissions with the logged-in user security token, they cannot access these other registry entries. (Microsoft Office) This is an instance where a registry cleaner will create havoc and do damage to the user profiles.Īpplications such as Microsoft Office installed on a machine that is used by more than one person can creates entries for each user in their private registry store: HKEY_CURRENT_USER. I understand exactly what the thread is about. Anyone who claims this should be cleaned for ANY reason does not understand how Windows Prefetching works.ĬCleaner Cripples Application Load Times ( Popular Technology) This option clearly needs a warning to prevent people from unknowingly hurting their system performance. The Prefetch folder is also ridiculously small so cleaning Prefetch files before the 128 limit will reclaim next to no disk space. If you disable the NTFS last access date stamp then this option will delete the whole contents of the Prefetch folder after a few weeks, which will cripple Windows Boot and all application load times. Just because a program was not used in a few weeks does not mean you want it to load as slow as possible when you do decide to use it. You should never delete a Prefetch file for any installed application since that would cripple it's load times. Since Windows XP already cleans this folder at 128 entries, this is a useless option that will only reduce system performance. This option removes Prefetch files that are a few weeks old based on the NTFS last access date. Never select this option for cleaning as it will increase application and Windows load times. Computer Engineering)ĬCleaner- Finally the useless, performance slowing cleaning option "Old Prefetch data" was moved to the advanced section and is now not selected by default. ![]() Registry Junk: A Windows Fact of Life ( Mark Russinovich, Ph.D. Even if the registry was massively bloated there would be little impact on the performance of anything other than exhaustive searches." There is no justification for the use of automated registry cleaning tools the results always show, they are of dubious merit as the "fix" for even one-off problems that need solving.Ī few hundred kilobytes of unused keys and values causes no noticeable performance impact on system operation. There are times that a fast registry editor with search is needed to fix a single issue under Expert hands. It most certainly if done should not be automated. This should not be a regular maintenance chore. Unecessary entries in the registry do no harm. There are no end-user benefits from running registry cleaners. It it unlikely to help, it can cause harm. Why would you, indeed.ĭo not bother with this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |